Investigation on the protection ability of two commonly packaging methods to apples during express transportation
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Jincheng | |
dc.contributor.author | Qiang, Hongli | |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, Mingwei | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Zhiguo | |
dc.contributor.author | Fadiji, Tobi | |
dc.contributor.author | Wani, Ali Abas | |
dc.contributor.author | Burgeon, Clément | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-24T09:00:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-24T09:00:03Z | |
dc.date.freetoread | 2025-04-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-03-01 | |
dc.date.pubOnline | 2025-03-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | Packaging plays a vital role in the post-harvest sales process of apples. This study conducted express transportation tests to evaluate the protective effectiveness of two commonly used packaging methods for apples. Key parameters assessed included real-time changes in temperature, humidity, vibration load, and CO₂ levels inside the packaging boxes during transit, as well as the storage quality of apples after transportation. Results showed significant variations in load distribution within corrugated partition-based cardboard boxes (CP combination packaging). Conversely, foam holder-based cardboard boxes (FP combination packaging) exhibited CO₂ accumulation. Furthermore, mechanical damage was predominantly localized to the fruit belly. Compared to CP combination packaging box, FP combination packaging box provided more stable shock resistance at lower vibration forces (< 10 N) across transit routes, likely due to its EPS foam design, which restricted fruit movement and absorbed external vibrations. Post-storage analysis showed that damaged apples experienced a 0.16 % increase in mass loss, a 0.83 % rise in soluble solids content (SSC), and a 0.19 MPa reduction in firmness compared to undamaged controls. These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing packaging design to minimize transport-induced damage and enhance apple preservation. | |
dc.description.journalName | Food Packaging and Shelf Life | |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by an International Cooperation Key Plan of Shaanxi Province (2022KWZ-12) and a High-End Foreign Expert Recruitment Program (G2022172006L). | |
dc.identifier.citation | Yu J, Qiang H, Shi M, et al, (2025) Investigation on the protection ability of two commonly packaging methods to apples during express transportation. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, Volume 48, March 2025, Article number 101475 | |
dc.identifier.elementsID | 567447 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2214-2894 | |
dc.identifier.paperNo | 101475 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2025.101475 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/23826 | |
dc.identifier.volumeNo | 48 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.publisher.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214289425000456?via%3Dihub | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences | |
dc.subject | 3008 Horticultural Production | |
dc.subject | 3006 Food sciences | |
dc.title | Investigation on the protection ability of two commonly packaging methods to apples during express transportation | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.subtype | Journal Article | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2025-03-07 |