Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Document Type: ||Article|
|Title: ||Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models|
|Authors: ||Agarwal, Vineet|
Taffler, Richard J.
|Issue Date: ||2008|
|Citation: ||Vineet Agarwal and Richard Taffler, Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, Volume 32, Number 8, Pages 1541-1551.|
|Abstract: ||Recently developed corporate bankruptcy prediction models adopt a contingent claims valuation approach. However, despite their theoretical appeal, tests of their performance compared with traditional simple accounting-ratio-based approaches are limited in the literature. We find the two approaches capture different aspects of bankruptcy risk, and while there is little difference in their predictive ability in the UK, the z-score approach leads to significantly greater bank profitability in conditions of differential decision error costs and competitive pricing regime. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff publications - School of Management|
Items in CERES are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.