Optimisation methods for battery electric vehicle powertrain.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Auger, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.advisor Whidborne, James F.
dc.contributor.author Othaganont, Pongpun
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-28T15:40:21Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-28T15:40:21Z
dc.date.issued 2017-07
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/19364
dc.description.abstract The battery electric vehicle (BEV) is considered to be one of the solutions for reducing greenhouse gasses and an alternative means of transportation. However, some current limitations such as higher powertrain costs, limited driving range and negative perceptions of that range, have reduced BEVs’ popularity. This thesis aims to improve the tank-to-wheel energy consumption of the BEV by presenting possible powertrain architectures and developing new tools for powertrain analysis. The study has two main objectives; the first is to evaluate different possible powertrain topologies. The selected topologies include the single-motor single-axle, the double-motor double-axle, the in-wheel-motor single-axle and the in-wheel-motor double-axle. Models of these powertrains have been modified from the Quasi-Static toolbox, using vehicle parameters from the Nissan Leaf and subject to state assumptions. The multi-objective optimisation method has been applied to establish the costs/benefits of energy consumption, acceleration performance and powertrain cost. The results show that each topology presents its own benefits as the in-wheel types are good at energy efficiency and drivability, while the cost of the powertrain is the major drawback. The non-in-wheel-motor vehicle provides sufficient energy efficiency and driveability with lower powertrain cost. The second objective is to evaluate a possible alternative tool for BEV powertrain modelling and optimisation. The tool consists of four methodologies: sensitivity analysis, differential flatness, the Chebfun computational tool and the multi-disciplinary optimisation method. The study presents a possible alternative optimisation tool which may perhaps benefit the designer. This new tool may not be as convenient as the previous one; however, the new tool may give the designer greater understanding and insight into the BEV powertrain. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.rights © Cranfield University, 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder.
dc.subject Battery electric vehicle en_UK
dc.subject multi-objective optimisation en_UK
dc.subject powertrain topologies en_UK
dc.subject sensitivity analysis en_UK
dc.subject differential flatness en_UK
dc.subject Chebfun en_UK
dc.subject multi-disciplinary optimisation en_UK
dc.title Optimisation methods for battery electric vehicle powertrain. en_UK
dc.type Thesis en_UK
dc.description.coursename PhD in Transport Systems en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics