Contrasting the crystallinity indicators of heated and diagenetically altered bone mineral

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Keith
dc.contributor.authorBeckett, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Samira
dc.contributor.authorChamberlain, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorClement, John
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-20T11:44:02Z
dc.date.available2011-01-20T11:44:02Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-01
dc.description.abstractModifications to bone mineral as a result of diagenesis or heating include a marked increase in crystallinity. Although these processes are not completely understood a number of simple, pragmatic approaches are in general use to quantify crystallinity and thus provide a relative metric for features such as preservation state. A preliminary investigation into the interpretation of crystallinity as measured by X-ray diffraction has been undertaken. The microstructural changes associated with diagenetically altered (archaeological) and heated contemporary bone have been examined. A common analysis approach was adopted and thus direct comparison between the physical features of these material systems has been possible. The data clearly demonstrate the pronounced anisotropic nature of the crystallite microstructure for both diagenetically altered and contemporary bone. The limitations of adopting simple crystallinity indices for characterising such materials are explored. Crystallite size and strain were shown to be dependent upon crystallographic direction. Overall, the diagenetically altered bone mineral possessed greater long range lattice order than that of contemporary heated bone. Further, significant differences between the directional nature of the microstructure of diagenetically altered and modern heated bone were observed. This study has enabled a direct comparison of the effects of heating and diagenesis upon bone mineral. It has demonstrated the need to consider bone microstructure anisotropically.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationKeith Rogers, Sophie Beckett, Samira Kuhn, Andrew Chamberlain, and John Clement, Contrasting the crystallinity indicators of heated and diagenetically altered bone mineral, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Volume 296, Issues 1-2, 1 October 2010, Pages 125-129en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0031-0182
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi/org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.06.021
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4749
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.subjectBoneen_UK
dc.subjectCrystallinityen_UK
dc.subjectX-ray diffractionen_UK
dc.subjectDiagenesisen_UK
dc.titleContrasting the crystallinity indicators of heated and diagenetically altered bone mineralen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Contrasting_the_crystallinity_indicators-2010.pdf
Size:
270.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications - Cranfield Health