Safety risk factors in two different types of routine outsourced work: a systematic literature review

Date

2020-07-08

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

1477-3996

Format

Free to read from

Citation

Pilbeam C, Denyer D, Doherty N. (2020) Safety risk factors in two different types of routine outsourced work: a systematic literature review. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, Volume 18, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 140-154

Abstract

Outsourcing generates risks for client firms but these vary according to the contracted task. This systematic literature review reports on 50 empirical studies that investigate the safety risk factors associated with outsourcing aligning them with the three categories of safety risk factors identified by Underhill and Quinlan in their PDR-Model. By using a 2x2 framework based on the strategic value of the task to the client firm (core or peripheral) and its level of complexity (complex or routine) we could combine studies of outsourced relationships between firms with those between firms and individuals. This demonstrated that there is little empirical evidence available for the safety risk factors associated with complex outsourced tasks. It also showed that routine tasks core to the client business contained risk factors associated with both economic and reward pressure and disorganization. Finally, safety risk factors associated with routine peripheral tasks were mainly due to economic and reward pressures in firm-to-individual contracting, but due to disorganization in firm-to-firm contracting.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Systematic literature review, Outsourcing, Safety Risk, Contractor

DOI

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s