Why agricultural tools work in theory but aren’t adopted in practice: a grounded theory approach to ICT in Ghana and Kenya
| dc.contributor.author | Mallory, Adrian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Parker, Alison | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hutchings, Paul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-27T08:53:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-04-27T08:53:05Z | |
| dc.date.embargo | 2022-04-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-04-14 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Organic fertilisers could contribute to addressing the issues of declining soil fertility, food security and waste management by recycling human waste for use in sub-Saharan Africa. The variable nutrient content of such products can make targetted application more difficult than in chemical fertilisers. One solution to this could be the use of in-field soil testing and information, particularly with the expansion of mobile technology. This research investigated the role of information and soil testing in 43 farmers using human waste derived fertilisers in Kenya and Ghana. Interviews were conducted to understand the use and sources of information in farming and the perception of soil testing technologies. It was found that mobile based testing was unlikely to be adopted for reasons of low priority, the type of knowledge being shared and trust after failures of different projects. Farmers did not see soil testing as the major issue that they needed to solve. Mobile technology was mostly used for visual and oral communication whereas soil testing often provided information in an unsuitable way. Farmers also had limited trust in new projects as they had previously had project failures that did not help them. In order to achieve sustainable adoption of technology there needs to be improved methods of disseminating and learning from project failures to prevent repeated attempts at inappropriate technology in the future. | en_UK |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mallory A, Parker A, Hutchings P, Sakrabani R. (2022) Why agricultural tools work in theory but aren’t adopted in practice: a grounded theory approach to ICT in Ghana and Kenya. Air, Soil and Water Research, Volume 15, January 2022 | en_UK |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1178-6221 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/11786221221092782 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/17811 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
| dc.publisher | SAGE | en_UK |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Africa | en_UK |
| dc.subject | agriculture | en_UK |
| dc.subject | failures | en_UK |
| dc.subject | international development | en_UK |
| dc.subject | organic agriculture | en_UK |
| dc.subject | soil testing | en_UK |
| dc.subject | sanitation | en_UK |
| dc.subject | farmer perception | en_UK |
| dc.title | Why agricultural tools work in theory but aren’t adopted in practice: a grounded theory approach to ICT in Ghana and Kenya | en_UK |
| dc.type | Article | en_UK |