Rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment - A review

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHassard, Francis
dc.contributor.authorBiddle, Jeremy R.
dc.contributor.authorCartmell, Elise
dc.contributor.authorJefferson, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorTyrrel, Sean F.
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-04T09:37:39Z
dc.date.available2016-03-04T09:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-04
dc.description.abstractRotating biological contactors (RBCs) for wastewater treatment began in the 1970s. Removal of organic matter has been targeted within organic loading rates of up to 120 g m−2 d−1 with an optimum at around 15 g m−2 d−1 for combined BOD and ammonia removal. Full nitrification is achievable under appropriate process conditions with oxidation rates of up to 6 g m−2 d−1 reported for municipal wastewater. The RBC process has been adapted for denitrification with reported removal rates of up to 14 g m−2 d−1 with nitrogen rich wastewaters. Different media types can be used to improve organic/nitrogen loading rates through selecting for different bacterial groups. The RBC has been applied with only limited success for enhanced biological phosphorus removal and attained up to 70% total phosphorus removal. Compared to other biofilm processes, RBCs had 35% lower energy costs than trickling filters but higher demand than wetland systems. However, the land footprint for the same treatment is lower than these alternatives. The RBC process has been used for removal of priority pollutants such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products. The RBC system has been shown to eliminate 99% of faecal coliforms and the majority of other wastewater pathogens. Novel RBC reactors include systems for energy generation such as algae, methane production and microbial fuel cells for direct current generation. Issues such as scale up remain challenging for the future application of RBC technology and topics such as phosphorus removal and denitrification still require further research. High volumetric removal rate, solids retention, low footprint, hydraulic residence times are characteristics of RBCs. The RBC is therefore an ideal candidate for hybrid processes for upgrading works maximising efficiency of existing infrastructure and minimising energy consumption for nutrient removal. This review will provide a link between disciplines and discuss recent developments in RBC research and comparison of recent process designs are provided (Section 2). The microbial features of the RBC biofilm are highlighted (Section 3) and topics such as biological nitrogen removal and priority pollutant remediation are discussed (Sections 4 and 5). Developments in kinetics and modelling are highlighted (Section 6) and future research themes are mentioned.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationHassard F, Biddle J, Cartmell E, et al., (2015) Rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment – A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Volume 94, March 2015, pp. 285-306en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0957-5820
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/9746
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.07.003
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.subjectBioaugmentationen_UK
dc.subjectBiofilmen_UK
dc.subjectBiological wastewater treatmenten_UK
dc.subjectBiological nitrogen removalen_UK
dc.subjectModellingen_UK
dc.subjectRotating biological contactoren_UK
dc.titleRotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment - A reviewen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rotating_biological_contractors_for_wastewater_treatment-a review-2015.pdf
Size:
813.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (SWEE)