Efficacy of mulch and tillage options to reduce runoff and soil loss from asparagus interrows

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNiziolomski, Joanna C.
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Robert W.
dc.contributor.authorRickson, R. Jane
dc.contributor.authorHann, Mike J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T14:04:01Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T14:04:01Z
dc.date.freetoread2020-08-04
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.description.abstractIn the UK, conventional asparagus cultivation practices on sloping land, erodible soils and increased frequency of extreme rainfall events combine to promote runoff generation and soil loss, particularly from interrows. This instrumented field study investigated the interactive effect of mulch and shallow soil disturbance (working depth of 0.175 m) on reducing runoff and soil loss. Ten treatments were installed in a commercial asparagus field near Ross-on-Wye (England, UK) during May 1st–July 17th, 2012. Straw and compost were applied to the interrows at high and low application rates (straw = 5 t ha−1 and 3 t ha−1 and compost = 18 t ha−1 and 8 t ha−1, respectively), both with or without shallow soil disturbance (SSD and Non-SSD) as compared with a bare soil, unamended Control. Across five sampling periods, Non-SSD straw mulch applied at 5 t ha−1 and 3 t ha−1; Non-SSD compost mulch at 18 t ha−1; and straw mulch applied at 5 t ha−1 with SSD all significantly reduced cumulative total soil loss by 53–72% as compared with the Control. Further, mulch treatments with SSD were in general less effective at reducing total soil loss as compared to non-SSD mulch treatments. Compost application was less effective than straw, due to sub-optimal compost blanket depths as dictated by N restrictions for Nitrate Vulnerable Zones, in which the study took place. Despite an overall reduction in total soil loss of 72% (associated with Non-SSD straw mulch applied at 5 t ha−1), soil erosion rates exceeded 1.4 t ha−1 yr−1, considered to be a tolerable erosion rate in the EU. In addition, measured sediment concentrations in the runoff consistently exceeded the EU water quality guideline value of 25 mg l−1. The results indicate that the efficacy of the treatments tested was not adequate to reduce soil erosion in commercial asparagus fields in the UK to tolerable rates. This may in large part be due to daily foot trafficking events that occur during the asparagus harvesting period (April–June) which disturbs and degrades the treatments applied reduing their efficacy. This study demonstrates that additional research is required in order to identify effective erosion control measures to ensure the sustainability of commercial asparagus production systems in the UKen_UK
dc.identifier.citationNiziolomski JC, Simmons RW, Rickson RJ, Hann MJ. (2020) Efficacy of mulch and tillage options to reduce runoff and soil loss from asparagus interrows. CATENA, Volume 191, August 2020, Article number 104557en_UK
dc.identifier.cris27701192
dc.identifier.issn0341-8162
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104557
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/15633
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSoil lossen_UK
dc.subjectErosionen_UK
dc.subjectRunoffen_UK
dc.subjectTillageen_UK
dc.subjectMulchen_UK
dc.subjectShallow soil disturbanceen_UK
dc.subjectAsparagusen_UK
dc.titleEfficacy of mulch and tillage options to reduce runoff and soil loss from asparagus interrowsen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Efficacy_of_mulch_and_tillage_options_to_reduce_runoff-2020.pdf
Size:
828.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (SWEE)