A comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAppleby-Thomas, Gareth J.
dc.contributor.authorJaansalu, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Amer
dc.contributor.authorPainter, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorShackel, James
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T15:31:18Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T15:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-20
dc.description.abstractProduction of ceramic armour solutions on-demand/in-theatre would have significant logistical and military advantages. However, even assuming that such technologies could be successfully deployed in the field, such near net-shape manufacturing technology is relatively immature compared to conventional sintering of ceramics. In this study, the ballistic performance of a series of additively manufactured (AM)/rapidly-prototyped (RP) alumina tiles of 97.2% of the density of Sintox FA™ were investigated using both forward- and reverse-ballistic experiments. These experiments, undertaken with compressed gas-guns, employed the depth-of-penetration technique and flash X-ray as primary diagnostics to interrogate both efficiency of penetration and projectile-target interaction, respectively. The RP alumina was found to exhibit useful ballistic properties, successfully defeating steel-cored (AP) 7.62 × 39 mm BXN rounds at velocities of up-to c.a. 850 m/s, while exhibiting comparable failure modes to conventionally sintered armour-grade Sintox FA™. However, where a <1% by vol. Cu dopant was introduced into the RP material failure modes changed dramatically with performance dropping below that of conventionally sintered alumina. Overall, the results from both sets of experiments were complimentary and clearly indicated the potential of such RP materials to play an active role in provision of real-world body armour solutions provided quality control of the RP material can be maintained.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationAppleby-Thomas GJ, Jaansalu K, Hameed A, et al., (2019) A comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured alumina. Defence Technology, Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2020, pp. 275-282en_UK
dc.identifier.issn2214-9147
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.06.020
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/14271
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAdditive manufactureen_UK
dc.subjectRapidly prototypeden_UK
dc.subjectBody armouren_UK
dc.subjectBallisticsen_UK
dc.subjectCeramicsen_UK
dc.titleA comparison of the ballistic behaviour of conventionally sintered and additively manufactured aluminaen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparision_of_the_ballistic_behaviour-alumina-2019 (1).pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (CDS)