Flower margins support natural enemies adjacent to apple orchards but evidence of spill-over is mixed

Date published

2025-02-28

Free to read from

2024-11-20

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0167-8809

Format

Citation

Howard C, Fountain MT, Brittain C, et al., (2025) Flower margins support natural enemies adjacent to apple orchards but evidence of spill-over is mixed. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Volume 379, February 2025, Article number 109327

Abstract

Perennial flower margins next to apple orchards can reduce the spread of aphid pests on apple trees and reduce the percentage of trees with fruit damage. To explore the mechanism behind this, we compared the vegetation community in three orchard habitats (flower margins, headlands, and alleyways) to determine whether the presence of a flower margin changed the diversity, abundance, and community of natural enemies of rosy apple aphid (Dysaphis plantaginea) in orchard ground vegetation and apple trees. Despite no evident spill-over of plant species into orchards, there was an increased Shannon diversity of natural enemies in the ground vegetation of flower margin orchards compared with controls. This suggests spill-over of natural enemies from the flower margins can reach up to 50 m from the orchard edge. However, we did not find evidence of broad differences between natural enemy taxa abundance, diversity, or community structure on the apple trees themselves. The mechanism behind improved pest control by flower margins is unclear but could be linked to the mobility of certain natural enemy groups or mutualistic relationships with ants. A better understanding of this mechanism would help to optimise the use of flower margins for sustainable pest suppression.

Description

Data available from the University of Reading Research Data Archive

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

4103 Environmental Biotechnology, 41 Environmental Sciences, Agronomy & Agriculture, 30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences, 41 Environmental sciences, 44 Human society

DOI

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Relationships

Resources

Funder/s

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
This work was financially supported by Syngenta and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) with the FoodBioSystems Doctoral Training Partnership (FBSDTP) (BB/T008776/1).