Innovative methods for soil parent material mapping

dc.contributor.advisorMayr, T.
dc.contributor.authorFarewell, Timothy S.
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-24T10:25:07Z
dc.date.available2010-09-24T10:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.description.abstractSoil parent material exerts a fundamental control on many environmental processes. Nevertheless, resulting from the separate mapping programmes of the geological and soil surveys, parent material is currently poorly mapped in the United Kingdom. This research develops and tests four methods of predicting soil parent material using three study areas in England. The qualities of desirable parent material maps were stated, and then used to create new map value metrics to assess the success of the four methodologies. Firstly, translations of surface and bedrock geology maps to parent material maps were tested, using international and national parent material classifications. Secondly, qualitative expert knowledge of parent material, captured from published literature, was formalised into inputs for a corrected probability model. Parent material likelihood was predicted using three map evidence layers: geology, slope and soil. Thirdly, extensive data mining was used to create fully quantitative inputs for the same probability model, and the results were compared. The final method provided a quantitative framework for the expert knowledge model inputs by the incorporation of sparse data sampling. The expert knowledge method created parent material maps of higher value than those created by the translation of geological maps. However, the inputs derived from qualitative expert knowledge were demonstrated to benefit from the addition of quantitative sample data. The resulting maps achieved overall accuracies between 60% and 90% and contained numerous detailed classes with explicit probabilities of prediction. Extensive parent materials were shown to be predicted well, and physically and chemically distinctive parent materials could be effectively predicted irrespective of their extent. Parent material class confusion arose between units where the evidence datasets were unable to provide the sufficient geographic or descriptive detail necessary for differentiation. In such cases, class amalgamation was used to overcome consistent misclassification. Recommendations are provided for the application of this research.en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4584
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCranfield Universityen_UK
dc.rights© Cranfield University, 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner.en_UK
dc.titleInnovative methods for soil parent material mappingen_UK
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_UK
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Farewell 2010 Innovative Methods for Soil Parent Material Mapping (High Resolution).pdf
Size:
251.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Digital Appendix 1 -The Expert Knowledge Workbook.doc
Size:
25 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Copy of Expert Knowledge Workbook (version 2).xls
Size:
12.8 MB
Format:
Microsoft Excel
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Digital Appendix 2 - The probability model workbook.doc
Size:
26 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Copy of The Probability Model Workbook.xls
Size:
16.56 MB
Format:
Microsoft Excel
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: