Designing Balance into the Democratic Project: Contrasting Jeffersonian Democracy against Bentham's Panopticon Centralisation in determining ICT adoption

Date

2007-01-01T00:00:00Z

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

1727-7051

Format

Free to read from

Citation

Nada K. Kakabadse, Andrew Kakabadse, Alexander Kouzmin; Designing Balance into the Democratic Project: Contrasting Jeffersonian Democracy against Bentham’s Panopticon Centralisation in determining ICT adoption. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 1, 2007

Abstract

Positioned in a critical realist perspective, this paper examines the impact of systematic and institutional distortion to communication and the use of information and communicative technology (ICT) for control over citizen participation within the Liberal-democratic process. The paper contrasts the Jeffersonian vision of democracy against Bentham’s Panopticon dystopia and reviews comparative models of democratic processes. In so doing, it is argued that the role of ICT, the role of pressure groups and concentrated media ownership and control pose significant issues for E-democracy, in particular that of less unfettered communication within the context of Liberal democracy. It is concluded that a new constitutional organ is required to enhance genuine participation within the Panopticon proclivities emergent in E-democrac

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Citizen, Communication, Democracy, E-democracy, Governance, Information, Jeffersonian Vision, Lobby Groups, Bentham’s Panopticon, Public Policy

DOI

Rights

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s