Magnetic ion-exchange resin treatment: Impact of water type and resin use

Date published

2008-04-30T00:00:00Z

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0043-1354

Format

Citation

Max R.D. Mergen, Bruce Jefferson, Simon A. Parsons, Peter Jarvis, Magnetic ion-exchange resin treatment: Impact of water type and resin use, Water Research, Volume 42, Issues 8-9, April 2008, Pages 1977-1988.

Abstract

Three raw waters of fundamentally different natural organic matter (NOM) character were treated by magnetic resin using a bench-scale method designed to mimic how the resin is used in continuous operation. Increasing water hydrophobicity resulted in reduced dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal with removal of 56%, 33% and 25% for waters containing 21%, 50% and 75% hydrophobic NOM, respectively. Study of consecutive resin uses showed that the NOM in the hydrophobic water had high affinity for the resin shown by DOC removal of 65% after the first use of the resin. This dropped to 25% DOC removal after 15 consecutive resin uses. For the more hydrophilic waters, NOM removal remained consistent after each resin use. The hydrophobic sample contained higher MW NOM that was capable of blocking resin sites that prevented continual adsorption of organics on to the resin. The hydrophilic NOM containing a large proportion of hydrophilic acids was consistently removed to around 60%. The water containing algogenic-derived NOM was poorly removed by magnetic resin. Subsequent coagulation showed higher removal with increasing hydrophobicity. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

algogenic coagulation hydrophilic hydrophobic magnetic ion-exchange resin MIEX natural organic matter natural organic-matter content surface-water bromate formation removal coagulation disinfection carbon pretreatment combination precursors

DOI

Rights

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Water Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Water Research, VOL 42, ISSUE 8-9, (2008) DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.032

Relationships

Relationships

Resources

Funder/s