Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPapaioannou, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorHtike, Zaw
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chenhui
dc.contributor.authorSiampis, Efstathios
dc.contributor.authorLongo, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorVelenis, Efstathios
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T09:22:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-11T09:22:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-11
dc.description.abstractAutomated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence.en_UK
dc.description.sponsorshipInnovate UK: EP/N509450/1en_UK
dc.identifier.citationPapaioannou G, Htike Z, Lin C, et al., (2022) Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives, Sensors, Volume 22, Issue 14, July 2022, Article number 5177en_UK
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s22145177
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/18302
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPIen_UK
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectautomated vehiclesen_UK
dc.subjectmotion planningen_UK
dc.subjectsorting alternativesen_UK
dc.subjectmotion sicknessen_UK
dc.subjectsafetyen_UK
dc.subjectenergy efficiencyen_UK
dc.subjectjourney timeen_UK
dc.titleMulti-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternativesen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sorting_motion_planner_alternatives-2022.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (SATM)