Multidisciplinary design optimization of the NASA metallic and composite common research model wingbox: addressing static strength, stiffness, aeroelastic, and manufacturing constraints

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDababneh, Odeh
dc.contributor.authorKipouros, Timoleon
dc.contributor.authorWhidborne, James F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-05T14:10:27Z
dc.date.available2025-06-05T14:10:27Z
dc.date.freetoread2025-06-05
dc.date.issued2025-06-01
dc.date.pubOnline2025-05-28
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) wingbox, utilizing both metallic and composite materials while addressing various constraints, including static strength, stiffness, aeroelasticity, and manufacturing considerations. The primary load-bearing wing structure is designed with high structural fidelity, resulting in a higher number of structural elements representing the wingbox model. This increased complexity expands the design space due to a greater number of design variables, thereby enhancing the potential for identifying optimal design alternatives and improving mass estimation accuracy. Finite element analysis (FEA) combined with gradient-based design optimization techniques was employed to assess the mass of the metallic and composite wingbox configurations. The results demonstrate that the incorporation of composite materials into the CRM wingbox design achieves a structural mass reduction of approximately 17.4% compared to the metallic wingbox when flutter constraints are considered and a 23.4% reduction when flutter constraints are excluded. When considering flutter constraints, the composite wingbox exhibits a 5.6% reduction in structural mass and a 5.3% decrease in critical flutter speed. Despite the reduction in flutter speed, the design remains free from flutter instabilities within the operational flight envelope. Flutter analysis, conducted using the p-k method, confirmed that both the optimized metallic and composite wingboxes are free from flutter instabilities, with flutter speeds exceeding the critical threshold of 256 m/s. Additionally, free vibration and aeroelastic stability analyses reveal that the composite wingbox demonstrates higher natural frequencies compared to the metallic version, indicating that composite materials enhance dynamic response and reduce susceptibility to aeroelastic phenomena. Fuel mass was also found to significantly influence both natural frequencies and flutter characteristics, with the presence of fuel leading to a reduction in structural frequencies associated with wing bending.
dc.description.journalNameAerospace
dc.identifier.citationDababneh O, Kipouros T, Whidborne JF. (2025) Multidisciplinary design optimization of the NASA metallic and composite common research model wingbox: addressing static strength, stiffness, aeroelastic, and manufacturing constraints. Aerospace, Volume 12, Issue 6, May 2025, Article number 476en_UK
dc.identifier.eissn2226-4310
dc.identifier.elementsID673553
dc.identifier.issn2226-4310
dc.identifier.issueNo6
dc.identifier.paperNo476
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060476
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/23990
dc.identifier.volumeNo12
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPIen_UK
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/6/476
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject40 Engineeringen_UK
dc.subject4001 Aerospace Engineeringen_UK
dc.subjectmultidisciplinary design optimizationen_UK
dc.subjectNASA modelen_UK
dc.subjecthigh-fidelity modelen_UK
dc.subjectwing massen_UK
dc.subjectflutter analysisen_UK
dc.titleMultidisciplinary design optimization of the NASA metallic and composite common research model wingbox: addressing static strength, stiffness, aeroelastic, and manufacturing constraintsen_UK
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-05-22

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Multidisciplinary_Design_Optimization_of_the_NASA-2025.pdf
Size:
2.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (AA)