When are bacteria dead? A step towards interpreting flow cytometry profiles after chlorine disinfection and membrane integrity staining

dc.contributor.authorNocker, A.
dc.contributor.authorCheswick, R.
dc.contributor.authorDutheil de la Rochere, P. M.
dc.contributor.authorDenis, M.
dc.contributor.authorLéziart, T.
dc.contributor.authorJarvis, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-06T14:40:01Z
dc.date.available2017-02-06T14:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-05
dc.description.abstractFlow cytometry is increasingly employed by drinking water providers. Its use with appropriate fluorescent stains allows the distinction between intact and membrane-damaged bacteria, which makes it ideally suited for assessment of disinfection efficiency. In contrast to plate counting, the technology allows the visualization of the gradual loss of membrane integrity. Although this sensitivity per se is very positive, it creates the problem of how this detailed viability information compares with binary plate counts where a colony is either formed or not. Guidelines are therefore needed to facilitate interpretation of flow cytometry results and to determine a degree of membrane damage where bacteria can be considered ‘dead’. In this study we subjected Escherichia coli and environmental microorganisms in real water to increasing chlorine concentrations. Resulting flow cytometric patterns after membrane integrity staining were compared with culturability and in part with redox activity. For laboratory-grown bacteria, culturability was lost at lower disinfectant concentrations than membrane integrity making the latter a conservative viability parameter. No recovery from chlorine was observed for four days. For real water, loss of membrane integrity had to be much more substantial to completely suppress colony formation, probably due to the heterogenic composition of the natural microbial community with different members having different susceptibilities to the disinfectant.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationNocker A, Cheswick R. et al., When are bacteria dead? A step towards interpreting flow cytometry profiles after chlorine disinfection and membrane integrity staining, Environmental Technology, Volume 38, Issue 7, 2017, pp. 891-900en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0959-3330
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1262463
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/11386
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis: STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titlesen_UK
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectBacteriaen_UK
dc.subjectchlorine disinfectionen_UK
dc.subjectviabilityen_UK
dc.subjectflow cytometryen_UK
dc.subjectlive-dead stainingen_UK
dc.subjectsurvivalen_UK
dc.titleWhen are bacteria dead? A step towards interpreting flow cytometry profiles after chlorine disinfection and membrane integrity stainingen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
When_are_bacteria_dead-2016.pdf
Size:
875.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: