Active control of hydrodynamic slug flow
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cao, Yi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Inyiama, Fidelis Chidozie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-23T11:01:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-07-23T11:01:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Multiphase flow is associated with concurrent flow of more than one phase (gas-liquid, liquid-solid, or gas-liquid-solid) in a conduit. The simultaneous flow of these phases in a flow line, may initiate a slug flow in the pipeline. Hydrodynamic slug flow is an alternate or irregular flow with surges of liquid slug and gas pocket. This occurs when the velocity difference between the gas flow rate and liquid flow rate is high enough resulting in an unstable hydrodynamic behaviour usually caused by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. Active feedback control technology, though found effective for the control of severe slugs, has not been studied for hydrodynamic slug mitigation in the literature. This work extends active feedback control application for mitigating hydrodynamic slug problem to enhance oil production and recovery. Active feedback Proportional-Integral (PI) control strategy based on measurement of pressure at the riser base as controlled variable with topside choking as manipulated variable was investigated through Olga simulation in this project. A control system that uses the topside choke valve to keep the pressure at the riser base at or below the average pressure in the riser slug cycle has been implemented. This has been found to prevent liquid accumulation or blockage of the flow line. OLGA (olga is a commercial software widely tested and used in oil and gas industries) has been used to assess the capability of active feedback control strategy for hydrodynamic slug control and has been found to give useful results and most interestingly the increase in oil production and recovery. The riser slugging was suppressed and the choke valve opening was improved from 5% to 12.65% using riser base pressure as controlled variable and topside choke valve as the manipulated variable for the manual choking when compared to the automatic choking in a stabilised operation, representing an improvement of 7.65% in the valve opening. Secondly, implementing active control at open-loop condition reduced the riser base pressure from 15.3881bara to 13.4016bara. | en_UK |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7996 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
| dc.publisher | Cranfield University | en_UK |
| dc.rights | © Cranfield University 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. | en_UK |
| dc.subject | Choking | en_UK |
| dc.subject | multiphase | en_UK |
| dc.subject | flow regime | en_UK |
| dc.subject | feedback control | en_UK |
| dc.subject | close-loop | en_UK |
| dc.subject | open-loop | en_UK |
| dc.subject | bifurcation map | en_UK |
| dc.subject | OLGA | en_UK |
| dc.title | Active control of hydrodynamic slug flow | en_UK |
| dc.type | Thesis or dissertation | en_UK |
| dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | en_UK |
| dc.type.qualificationname | MSc by Research | en_UK |