A preliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in Swaziland

Date published

2010-02-01T00:00:00Z

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0308-521X

Format

Citation

J.W. Knox, J.A. Rodríguez Díaz, D.J. Nixon, M. Mkhwanazi, A preliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in Swaziland, Agricultural Systems, Volume 103, Issue 2, February 2010, Pages 63-72.

Abstract

The spatial and temporal impacts of climate change on irrigation water requirements and yield for sugarcane grown in Swaziland have been assessed, by combining the outputs from a general circulation model (HadCM3), a sugarcane crop growth model and a GIS. The CANEGRO model (embedded with the DSSAT program) was used to simulate the baseline and future cane net annual irrigation water requirements (IRnet) and yield (t ha-1) using a reference site and selected emissions scenario (SRES A2 and B2) for the 2050s (including CO2-fertilisation effects). The simulated baseline yields were validated against field data from 1980-1997. An aridity index was defined and used to correlate agroclimate variability against irrigation need to estimate the baseline and future irrigation water demand (volumetric). To produce a unit weight of sucrose equivalent to current optimum levels of production, future irrigation needs were predicted to increase by 20-22%. With CO2-fertilisation, the impacts of climate change are offset by higher crop yields, such that IRnet is predicted to increase by 9%. The study showed that with climate change, the current peak capacity of existing irrigation schemes could fail to meet the predicted increases in irrigation demand in nearly 50% of years assuming unconstrained water availability.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

DOI

Rights

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Agricultural Systems. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Agricultural Systems, VOL 103, ISSUE 2, (2010) DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.09.002

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s