Integrators’ Air Network A review of the Domestic Express European Market

dc.contributor.advisorMorrell, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLafaye , Alexandre
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-13T11:14:48Z
dc.date.available2009-01-13T11:14:48Z
dc.date.issued2007-09
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. The thesis sets out the results of a structured programme of research or design, development or management studies demonstrating the candidate's own ability to conduct original investigations, to test ideas (either from the candidate's own or those of others) and to obtain appropriate conclusions from the work. Unlike the situation applicable for theses produced in connection with doctoral degrees, candidates are not required to exercise independent critical judgement in the relevant field of study or to make an original contribution to knowledge. A Master's thesis is not intended to be an absolutely definitive work on the subject to which it relates. Theses encapsulate and present the results of a programme of study and research, undertaken in a defined period of time, and do so in a way that has satisfied the assessment requirements for the degree to which they relate.en_UK
dc.description.abstractThe express industry witnessed dramatic growth during the 1990’s with an economic environment changing toward globalisation. Integrators’ international expansion has been supported by extensive transportation networks applying the model developed by FedEx: the hub and spoke model. This report investigates integrators’ air network configurations within a specific geographical area: the intra-European market. The research has been focused on the big four integrators, DHL, FedEx, TNT and UPS and provides an analysis on their strategy. Before presenting integrators, a review of the different network models presents the major role played by the Hub and Spoke network in the express freight industry. This model is one of the strategic foundations of the integrators’ success. Afterwards, the paper deals with three objectives. It first identifies the hub and spoke network configurations selected by integrators in Europe. Then, work uncovers the drivers behind network configuration. Finally, the key factors influencing the European Hub location are discussed through the case of the DHL move to Leipzig. This paper provides a location analysis and compares Brussels to Leipzig in term of distance to the core market. This paper brings several conclusions. First of all, there is a strategic area to locate a central hub in Europe, between Amsterdam Liege & Paris. Moreover several factors influence central hub selection as followed: market proximity, Airport capacity 1 , environmental restrictions 2 , operational cost and capacity of driving traffic are the key factors. Secondly, two hub and spoke configurations are used by integrators in Europe, the single hub and spoke network with pickup stopovers and feeders and the multi-hub and spoke configuration. Finally, network configuration relies particularly on the size of business and the transport strategy elected. 1 This term includes slots restrictions, runway capacity, and possibility of building logistic facilities. 2 Includes night curfews and environmental concerns of the local communityen_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1826/3073
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCranfield Universityen_UK
dc.rights© Cranfield University 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owneren_UK
dc.titleIntegrators’ Air Network A review of the Domestic Express European Marketen_UK
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevelMastersen_UK
dc.type.qualificationnameMScen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alexandre Lafaye Thesis 2007.pdf
Size:
1.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: