Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models
Date published
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
Free to read from
Authors
Supervisor/s
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
Department
Type
Article
ISSN
0378-4266
Format
Citation
Vineet Agarwal and Richard Taffler, Comparing the performance of market-based and accounting-based bankruptcy prediction models, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, Volume 32, Number 8, Pages 1541-1551.
Abstract
Recently developed corporate bankruptcy prediction models adopt a contingent claims valuation approach. However, despite their theoretical appeal, tests of their performance compared with traditional simple accounting-ratio-based approaches are limited in the literature. We find the two approaches capture different aspects of bankruptcy risk, and while there is little difference in their predictive ability in the UK, the z-score approach leads to significantly greater bank profitability in conditions of differential decision error costs and competitive pricing regime. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Description
Software Description
Software Language
Github
Keywords
DOI
Rights
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Banking & Finance. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, Volume 32, Number 8, Pages 1541-1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.014