The evaluation of methods for the prospective patient safety hazard analysis of ward-based oxygen therapy

dc.contributor.advisorFuller, Graham
dc.contributor.advisorWainwright, Charles
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Marcus L.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-09T11:02:27Z
dc.date.available2010-07-09T11:02:27Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractWhen even seemingly benign and routine processes fail in healthcare, people sometimes die. The profound effect on the patient’s families and the healthcare staff involved is clear (Vincent and Coulter, 2002), while further consequences are felt by the institution involved, both financially and by damage to reputation. The trend in healthcare for learning through experience of adverse events is no longer a viable philosophy (Department of Health,Sir Ian Carruthers OBE and Pauline Philip, 2006). In order to make progress towards preventative learning, three Prospective Hazard Analysis (PHA) methods used in other industries were evaluated for use in the area of ward based healthcare. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) were compared to each other in terms of ease of use, information they provide and the manner in which it is presented. Their results were also compared to baseline data produced through empirical research. Oxygen Therapy was used in this research as an example of a common ward based therapy. The resulting analysis listed 186 hazards almost all of which could lead to death, especially if combined. FTA and FMEA provided better system coverage than HAZOP and identified more hazards than were contained in the initial hazard identification method common to both techniques. FMEA and HAZOP needed some modification before use, with HAZOP requiring the most extensive adjustment. FTA has a very useful graphical presentation and was the only method capable of displaying causal linkage, but required that hazards be translated into events for analysis. It was concluded that formal Prospective Hazard Analysis (PHA) was applicable to this area of healthcare and presented added value through a combination of detailed information on possible hazards and accurate risk assessment based on a combination of expert opinion and empirical data. This provides a mechanism for evidence based identification of hazard barriers and safeguards as well as a method for formal communication of results at any stage of an analysis. It may further provide a very valuable vehicle for documented learning through prospective analysis incorporating feedback from previous experience and adverse incidents. The clear definition of systems and processes that form part of these methods provides a valuable opportunity for learning and the enduring capture and dissemination of tacit knowledge that can be continually updated and used for the formulation of strategies for safety and quality improvement.en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1826/4480
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCranfield Universityen_UK
dc.rights© Cranfield University, 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder.en_UK
dc.subjectHealthcareen_UK
dc.subjectFMEAen_UK
dc.subjectFault Treeen_UK
dc.subjectHAZOPen_UK
dc.subjectHospitalen_UK
dc.subjectErroren_UK
dc.subjectFailureen_UK
dc.subjectClinical Risken_UK
dc.subjectObservationen_UK
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_UK
dc.subjectIncident Reporten_UK
dc.titleThe evaluation of methods for the prospective patient safety hazard analysis of ward-based oxygen therapyen_UK
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_UK
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Marcus_Durand_thesis_2009.pdf
Size:
3.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: