Benchmarking risk management practice within the water utility sector

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorPollard, Simon
dc.contributor.advisorStrutt, J. E.
dc.contributor.authorMacGillivray, Brian H.
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-26T09:22:29Z
dc.date.available2008-07-26T09:22:29Z
dc.date.issued2006-12
dc.description.abstractExplicit approaches to risk analysis within the water utility sector, traditionally applied to occupational health and safety and public health protection, are now seeing broader application in contexts including corporate level decision making, asset management, watershed protection and network reliability. Our research suggested that neither the development of novel risk analysis techniques nor the refinement of existing ones was of paramount importance in improving the capabilities of water utilities to manage risk. It was thought that a more fruitful approach would be to focus on the implementation of risk management rather than the techniques employed per se. Thus, we developed a prescriptive capability maturity model for benchmarking the maturity of implementation of water utility risk management practice, and applied it to the sector via case study and benchmarking survey. We observed risk management practices ranging from the application of hazard and operability studies, to the use of scenario planning in guiding organisational restructuring programmes. We observed methods for their institutionalisation, including the use of initiation criteria for applying risk analysis techniques; the adoption of formalised procedures to guide their application; and auditing and peer reviews to ensure procedural compliance and provide quality assurance. We then built upon this research to develop a descriptive1 capability maturity model of utility risk analysis and risk based decision making practice, and described its case study application. The contribution to knowledge of this stage of the research was three-fold, we: synthesized empirical observations with behavioral and normative theories to codify the processes of risk analysis and risk based decision making; placed these processes within a maturity framework which distinguishes their relative maturity of implementation from ad hoc to adaptive; and provided a comparative analysis of risk analysis and risk based decision making practices, and their maturity of implementation, across a range of utility functions. The research provides utility managers, technical staff, project managers and chief finance officers with a practical and systematic understanding of how to implement and improve risk management, and offers preliminary guidance to regulators concerning how improved water utility governance can be made real.en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1826/2797
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherCranfield Universityen_UK
dc.rights© Cranfield University 2006. All rights reserved. No part of the document may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner.en_UK
dc.titleBenchmarking risk management practice within the water utility sectoren_UK
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_UK
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MacGillivray_Thesis.pdf
Size:
976.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MacGillivray_Thesis_Appendices.pdf
Size:
483.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

PhD, EngD, MPhil and MSc by research theses (SAS)