A comparative analysis of optimization algorithms for finite element model updating on numerical and experimental benchmarks

Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU) is a common approach to model-based Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of civil structures and infrastructures. Its application can be further utilized to produce effective digital twins of a permanently monitored structure. The FEMU concept, simple yet effective, involves calibrating and/or updating a numerical model based on the recorded dynamic response of the target system. This enables to indirectly estimate its material parameters, thus providing insight into its mass and stiffness distribution. In turn, this can be used to localize structural changes that may be induced by damage occurrence. However, several algorithms exist in the scientific literature for FEMU purposes. This study benchmarks three well-established global optimization techniques—namely, Generalized Pattern Search, Simulated Annealing, and a Genetic Algorithm application—against a proposed Bayesian sampling optimization algorithm. Although Bayesian optimization is a powerful yet efficient global optimization technique, especially suitable for expensive functions, it is seldom applied to model updating problems. The comparison is performed on numerical and experimental datasets based on one metallic truss structure built in the facilities of Cranfield University. The Bayesian sampling procedure showed high computational accuracy and efficiency, with a runtime of approximately half that of the alternative optimization strategies.