Where do uncertainties reside within environmental risk assessments? Testing UnISERA, a guide for uncertainty assessment

Date published

2017-03-08

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0269-7491

Format

Citation

Skinner DJC, Rocks SA, Pollard SJT, (2017) Where do uncertainties reside within environmental risk assessments? Testing UnISERA, a guide for uncertainty assessment, Environmental Pollution, Volume 225, June 2017, pp. 390-402

Abstract

A means for identifying and prioritising the treatment of uncertainty (UnISERA) in environmental risk assessments (ERAs) is tested, using three risk domains where ERA is an established requirement and one in which ERA practice is emerging. UnISERA's development draws on 19 expert elicitations across genetically modified higher plants, particulate matter, and agricultural pesticide release and is stress tested here for engineered nanomaterials (ENM). We are concerned with the severity of uncertainty; its nature; and its location across four accepted stages of ERAs. Using an established uncertainty scale, the risk characterisation stage of ERA harbours the highest severity level of uncertainty, associated with estimating, aggregating and evaluating expressions of risk. Combined epistemic and aleatory uncertainty is the dominant nature of uncertainty. The dominant location of uncertainty is associated with data in problem formulation, exposure assessment and effects assessment. Testing UnISERA produced agreements of 55%, 90%, and 80% for the severity level, nature and location dimensions of uncertainty between the combined case studies and the ENM stress test. UnISERA enables environmental risk analysts to prioritise risk assessment phases, groups of tasks, or individual ERA tasks and it can direct them towards established methods for uncertainty treatment.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Uncertainty, Identification, Environmental, Risk, Assessment

DOI

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s