Performance comparison between isothermal hot corrosion and in situ cyclic hot corrosion of nickel-based superalloys

dc.contributor.authorSyed, Adnan. U.
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Fabian Duarte
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorEncinas-Oropesa, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorMorar, Nicolau I.
dc.contributor.authorGrohne, Marlene
dc.contributor.authorFrommherz, Martin
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, John R.
dc.contributor.authorGray, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T09:18:34Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T09:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-28
dc.description.abstractAlthough a lot of work has been done to understand both major mechanisms of hot corrosion, namely type I (high-temperature hot corrosion) and type II (low temperature hot corrosion), there is very little information available on more representative cyclic performance in these regimes. This work addresses this by assessing the performance of isothermal (type I and type II) hot corrosion tests against combined (short and long) cyclic corrosion tests. Single-crystal alloy PWA 1484 and directionally solidified alloy MAR-M247 were assessed in all test regimes. Pre- and post-exposure dimensional metrology was used to quantify the corrosion damage and characterised using SEM/EDX. This paper highlights that the results of short cycle test conditions are more damaging compared to long cycle and standard isothermal type I and II test conditions. The cast nickel-based alloy MAR-M247 was found to be a better performer compared to PWA 1484 single-crystal alloy.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationSyed AU, Duarte Martinez F, et al., (2021) Performance comparison between isothermal hot corrosion and in situ cyclic hot corrosion of nickel-based superalloys. Oxidation of Metals, Volume 96, Number 1-2, pp. 43–55en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0030-770X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11085-021-10044-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/16825
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringeren_UK
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPWA 1484en_UK
dc.subjectMAR-M247en_UK
dc.subjectThermal cyclicen_UK
dc.subjectIsothermalen_UK
dc.subjectHot corrosionen_UK
dc.titlePerformance comparison between isothermal hot corrosion and in situ cyclic hot corrosion of nickel-based superalloysen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Performance_comparison_between_isothermal_hot_corrosion-2021.pdf
Size:
2.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: