Soil–plant–pollinator relationships in urban grass and meadow habitats: competing benefits and demands of tall flowering plants on soil and pollinator diversity
| dc.contributor.author | Rust, Will | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sotkewicz, Madison | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Zhaoxing | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mercer, Theresa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Alice S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-09T14:02:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-09T14:02:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-19 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Urban green spaces can be important habitats for soil, plant, and pollinator diversity and the complementary ecosystem functions they confer. Most studies tend to investigate the relationships between plant diversity with either soil or pollinator diversity, but establishing their relationship across habitat types could be important for optimising ecosystem service provision via alternative management (for instance, urban meadows in place of short amenity grass). Here, we investigate soil–plant–pollinator relationships across urban grass and meadow habitats through a range of measured biodiversity (soil mesofauna and macrofauna, plants, aboveground invertebrates, and pollinators) and edaphic variables. We found significant effects of habitat type on available nutrients (plant and soil C:N ratios) but less clear relationships were observed between habitat type and diversity metrics. Soil–plant–pollinator interactions across habitat types and sites showed an interconnection, whereby flowering plant abundance increased alongside soil macrofauna abundance. Site characteristics that showed strong effects on plant and invertebrate diversity metrics were C:N ratios (plant and soil) and soil pH, suggesting a potential role of nutrient availability on soil–plant–pollinator associations. Our results suggest that a combination of short-mown grass, tall grass, and sown flowers can provide greater benefits for soil and pollination services as each habitat type benefits different taxa due to differing sensitivities to management practices. For example, pollinators benefit from sown flowers but soil fauna are sensitive to annual sowing. Our results also indicate that sown flowers may not optimise overall biodiversity as expected due to disturbance and the depleting role of tall, flowering plants on soil nutrient availability. Future research across a greater range of sites in urban landscapes would resolve the potential role of nutrient availability in modulating soil–plant–pollinator interactions in urban green spaces. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rust W, Sotkewicz M, Li Z, et al., (2024) Soil–plant–pollinator relationships in urban grass and meadow habitats: competing benefits and demands of tall flowering plants on soil and pollinator diversity. Diversity, Volume 16, Issue 6, June 2024, Article number 354 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1424-2818 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060354 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/22600 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/16/6/354 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | soil fauna | |
| dc.subject | pollinators | |
| dc.subject | invertebrates | |
| dc.subject | plant diversity | |
| dc.subject | abundance | |
| dc.subject | urban green spaces | |
| dc.subject | mowing | |
| dc.subject | meadows | |
| dc.title | Soil–plant–pollinator relationships in urban grass and meadow habitats: competing benefits and demands of tall flowering plants on soil and pollinator diversity | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-06-13 |