Bankruptcy Risk Prediction and Pricing: Unravelling the Negative Distress Risk Premium

Date

2012-04

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cranfield University

Department

Type

Thesis or dissertation

ISSN

item.page.extent-format

Citation

Abstract

In sharp contrast to the basic risk-return assumption of theoretical finance, the empirical evidence shows that distressed firms underperform non-distressed firms (e.g. Dichev, 1998; Agarwal and Taffler, 2008b). Existing literature argues that a shareholder advantage effect (Garlappi and Yan, 2011), limits of arbitrage (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997) or gambling retail investor (Kumar, 2009) could drive the underperformance. Herein, I test these potential explanations and explore the drivers of distress risk. In order to do so, I require a clean measure of distress risk. Measures of distress risk have usually been accounting-based, market-based or hybrids using both information sources. I provide the first comprehensive study that employs a variety of performance tests on different prediction models. Cont/d.

Description

item.page.description-software

item.page.type-software-language

item.page.identifier-giturl

Keywords

Rights

© Cranfield University, 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner.

item.page.relationships

item.page.relationships

item.page.relation-supplements