Evaluation of soft tissue simulant performance against economic and environmental impact

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRead, James
dc.contributor.authorMcNaught, Ken
dc.contributor.authorHazael, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:36:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-22
dc.description.abstractSoft tissue simulants are traditionally used to provide a post impact medium suitable for replicating human anatomy. Performance of materials is therefore paramount, and the analysis of such experimentation relies on responses that mimic the various tissue, bone and muscle groups contained within the human body. However, with an increasing global push to reduce carbon emissions and increase sustainability, current materials require examination to ensure research establishments remain at the forefront of environmentally friendly practices. To date, the literature contains little in relation to how environmentally friendly the use and supply of soft tissue simulants is. The aim of the research is to provide researchers with primary data to support decisions on material selection for ballistic simulation research. The need arises due to the high cost and environmental impact of existing materials. To explore this research gap, a series of 5.5 mm ball bearings were fired from a gas gun at velocity ranges between 122 and 526 m s−1 to examine the performance characteristics of six commercially available soft tissue simulants and a foodstuffs grade gelatine that represented a more cost effective environmentally friendly alternative. A structured multi-criteria decision analysis approach was employed to compare the overall effectiveness of the alternative materials. It was found that whilst PermaGel, 20 and 10% ballistic gelatine performed the most advantageously respectively during experimental testing, qualitative environmental assessment showed ballistic soap, PermaGel and foodstuffs gelatine to be most advantageous. The information provided within this study will enable researchers to make more informed decisions on both economic and environmental implications when sourcing materials for use within survivability assessment, whilst further work would increase awareness and viability of alternative materials.en_UK
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Cranfield Forensics Institute and Defence Equipment and Support.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationRead J, McNaught K, Hazael, R, Critchley R. (2024) Evaluation of soft tissue simulant performance against economic and environmental impact. Environmental Sciences: Advances. Volume 3, Issue 4, April 2024, pp. 585-602en_UK
dc.identifier.issn2754-7000
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/D3VA00403A
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/20880
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_UK
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleEvaluation of soft tissue simulant performance against economic and environmental impacten_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-13

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evaluation_of_soft_tissue_simulant_performance-2024.pdf
Size:
5.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (CDS)