Service provider boundaries in competitive markets: the case of the logistics industry

Date

2018-10-22

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0020-7543

Format

Free to read from

Citation

Koenig C, Caldwell N & Ghadge A. Service provider boundaries in competitive markets: the case of the logistics industry. International Journal of Production Research, Volume 57, Issue 18, pp. 5624-5639.

Abstract

The study empirically investigates service provider firms’ attempts to move to higher value added market segments in competitive and fragmented markets; using logistics services as a context. Novelty is added by taking the provider not the customer or outsourcing actor perspective, common to current third-party logistics perspectives. Data were collected in the form of semi-structured interviews with management at various provider firms. The interview guide was based on theoretical constructs regarding tangible and intangible capabilities (RBV) as well as constructs related to governance and integration (TCE). Unlike customer focused studies, this study is able to identify what distinguishes the rare successful boundary crossing attempts that lead to a more profitable market position. The key finding which contradicts studies based on the customer/outsourcing actor perspective, is that a switch from a highly commoditized market position to a higher margin position is only possible, if relationships and network capabilities are leveraged, regardless of the assets and physical resources available to the firm. The presentation of service boundaries as both dynamic and fluid and the use of RBV are contributions, building on existing theory, illustrating why providers of commoditized services cannot escape from low-margin, competitive market positions simply by acquiring tangible assets.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

service boundaries, service providers, logistics, competitive markets, Resource based view, Transaction cost economics

DOI

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s