Robots for minimally invasive diagnosis and intervention

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHuda, Nazmul
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hongnian
dc.contributor.authorCang, Shuang
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-24T11:09:31Z
dc.date.available2016-05-24T11:09:31Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-16
dc.description.abstractMinimally invasive diagnosis and interventions provide many benefits such as higher efficiency, safer, minimum pain, quick recovery etc. over conventional way for many procedures. Large robots such as da-Vinci are being used in this purpose, whereas research of miniature robots for laparoscopic and endoscopic use, is growing in the recent years. A comprehensive literature search is performed using keywords’ laparoscopic robot, capsule endoscope, surgical medical robot etc. primarily for the time period of 2000–2015. The articles relevant to the theme of the paper are reviewed and included in the paper. This paper concentrates medical robots for minimally invasive diagnosis and intervention in general and propulsions of miniature robots in particular. Robots are classified and compared using critical characteristics and summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6. Large robots such as da-Vinci are successfully used in many procedures e.g. neurosurgery, cardiothoracic surgery etc. However there are needs for more functionality which might lead to flexible robots. For miniature robots, each propulsion mechanism has some advantages and disadvantages. While external magnetic propulsions have potential to provide propulsion without increasing the robot size, they lack precise position control and may require expensive and bulky equipment. On the other hand internal propulsions have the capability of precise position control but require mechanisms which need substantial amount of power to drive. Hybrid propulsion which combines best features of both internal and external propulsions could be a solution for this. Robots have improved the healthcare services for many medical procedures. However, still there are challenges to address to enable use of medical robots universally inside and outside hospitals for diagnosis and interventions.en_UK
dc.identifier.citationM. Nazmul Huda, Hongnian Yu, Shuang Cang, Robots for minimally invasive diagnosis and intervention, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Volume 41, October 2016, pp127-144en_UK
dc.identifier.issn0736-5845
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.03.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/9910
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.03.003
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMedical roboten_UK
dc.subjectCapsule endoscopyen_UK
dc.subjectLaparoscopic surgeryen_UK
dc.subjectPropulsion mechanismen_UK
dc.subjectIn vivo miniature roboten_UK
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgeryen_UK
dc.titleRobots for minimally invasive diagnosis and interventionen_UK
dc.typeArticleen_UK

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Robots_for_minimally_invasive_dagnosis_and_intervention-2016.pdf
Size:
4.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Staff publications (SATM)