Stress, strain, or energy? Which one is superior predictor of fatigue life in notched components? A novel machine learning-based framework

dc.contributor.authorMirzaei, Amir M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T10:53:08Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T10:53:08Z
dc.date.freetoread2024-09-30
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.date.pubOnline2024-08-27
dc.description.abstractThis paper introduces an efficient framework for accurately predicting the fatigue lifetime of notched components under uniaxial loading within the high-cycle fatigue regime. For this purpose, various machine learning algorithms are applied to a wide range of materials, loading conditions, notch geometries, and fatigue lives. Traditional approaches for this task have mostly relied on one of the mechanical response parameters, such as stress, strain, or energy. This study also concludes which of these parameters serves as a better measure. The key idea of the framework is to use the profile (field distribution represented by some points) of the mechanical response parameters (stress, strain, and energy release rate) to distinguish between different notch geometries. To demonstrate the accuracy and broad applicability of the framework, it is initially validated using metal materials, subsequently applied to specimens produced through additive manufacturing techniques, and ultimately tested on carbon fiber laminated composites. This research demonstrates the effective use of all three parameters in estimating fatigue lifetime, while stress-based predictions exhibit the highest accuracy. Among the machine learning algorithms investigated, Gradient Boosting and Random Forest yield the most successful results. A noteworthy finding is the significant improvement in prediction accuracy achieved by incorporating new data generated based on the Basquin equation.
dc.description.journalNameEngineering Fracture Mechanics
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission
dc.identifier.citationMirzaei AM. (2024) Stress, strain, or energy? Which one is superior predictor of fatigue life in notched components? A novel machine learning-based framework. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Volume 309, October 2024, Article number 110401
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7315
dc.identifier.elementsID552587
dc.identifier.issn0013-7944
dc.identifier.paperNo110401
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110401
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/22985
dc.identifier.volumeNo309
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectFatigue life prediction
dc.subjectNotch
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturing
dc.subjectCarbon fiber laminated composites
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject4016 Materials Engineering
dc.subjectMachine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
dc.subjectBioengineering
dc.subject7 Affordable and Clean Energy
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering & Transports
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.titleStress, strain, or energy? Which one is superior predictor of fatigue life in notched components? A novel machine learning-based framework
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.subtypeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-08-13

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stress_Strain_or_Energy-2024.pdf
Size:
2.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: