A comparative analysis of hybrid sensor fusion schemes for visual–inertial navigation

Date published

2025-12-31

Free to read from

2025-04-17

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0018-9456

Format

Citation

Tabassum TE, Petrunin I, Rana ZA. (2025) A comparative analysis of hybrid sensor fusion schemes for visual–inertial navigation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Available online 28 March 2025

Abstract

Visual Inertial Odometry (VIO) has been extensively studied for navigation in GNSS-denied environments, but its performance can be heavily impacted by the complexity of the navigation environments such as weather conditions, illumination variation, flight dynamics, and environmental structure. Hybrid fusion approaches integrating Neural Networks (NN), especially Gated Recurrent units (GRU) with the Kalman filters (KF), such as Error-State Kalman Filter (ESKF) have shown promising results mitigating system nonlinearities due to challenging environmental conditions data issues, there is a lack of systematic studies quantitively analysing and comparing performance differences unhand. To address this gap and enable robust navigation in complex conditions, this study proposes and systematically analyses the performance of three hybrid fusion schemes for VIO-based navigation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). These three hybrid VIO schemes include Visual Odometry (VO) error compensation using NN, KF error compensation using NN, and prediction of Kalman gain using NN. The comparative analysis is performed using data generated in MATLAB incorporating the Unreal Engine involving diverse challenging environmental conditions: fog, rain, illumination level variability and variability in the number of features available for extraction during the UAV flight in the urban environment. The results demonstrate the performance improvement achieved by hybrid VIO fusion schemes compared to ESKF-based traditional fusion methods in the presence of multiple visual failure modes. Comparative analysis reveals notable improvement achieved by method 1 with enhancements of 93% in sunny, 91% in foggy and 90% in rainy conditions than the other two hybrid VIO architectures.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

40 Engineering, 4001 Aerospace Engineering, Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 4006 Communications engineering, 4008 Electrical engineering, 4009 Electronics, sensors and digital hardware, Error compensation, failure modes, hybrid visual-inertial odometry (VIO), Kalman filter (KF), neural networks (NNs), robustness

DOI

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Relationships

Relationships

Resources

Funder/s