Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives.

Date

2007-09

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Department

Type

Postprint

ISSN

0925-5273

Format

Free to read from

Citation

K. Vergidis, A. Tiwari, B. Majeed, R. Roy, Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives, International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 109, Issues 1-2, Special Section on Cost Engineering, September 2007, Pages 105-121.

Abstract

Most of the current attempts for business process optimisation are manual without involving any formal automated methodology. This paper proposes a framework for multi-objective optimisation of business process designs. The framework uses a generic business process model that is formally defined and specifies process cost and duration as objective functions. The business process model is programmed and incorporated into a software platform where a selection of multi-objective optimisation algorithms is applied to a range of test designs including a real example. The test business process designs are of varying complexity and are optimised with three popular optimisation techniques (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA2), Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II (SPEA2) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation (MOPSO) algorithms). The results indicate that although business process optimisation is a highly constrained problem with fragmented search space; multi-objective optimisation algorithms such as NSGA2 and SPEA2 produce a satisfactory number of alternative optimised business process designs. However, the performance of the optimisation algorithms drops sharply as the complexity of the process designs increases. This paper also discusses the directions for future research in this particular area.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Business process (bp), bp optimisation, bp re-design, bp modelling and analysis

DOI

Rights

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s