Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives

Date

2010-01-01T00:00:00Z

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0148-2963

Format

Citation

Anne Mollen and Hugh Wilson, Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives, Journal of Business Research, Volume 63, Issues 9–10, September–October 2010, Pages 919–925

Abstract

We propose a conceptual framework that reconciles the practitioners’ view of engagement as central to online best practice and the scholarly view that tends to use other constructs to assess consumer experience. Building on research in e-learning as well as online marketing, we characterize the consumer experiential response to website and environmental stimuli as a dynamic, tiered perceptual spectrum which includes interactivity, telepresence and engagement. We construe engagement as a cognitive and affective commitment to an active relationship with the brand as personified by the website, and we propose dimensions of this construct. We discuss how the constructs of flow and involvement are related to but distinct from the constructs within our conceptual framework. We offer suggestions for future empirical research into developing a scale for engagement and assessing its importance and utilit

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

DOI

Rights

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Business Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Business Research, Volume 63, Issues 9–10, September–October 2010, Pages 919–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements