Technologies and multi-barrier systems for sustainable groundwater recharge and irrigation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Jefferson, Bruce
dc.contributor.author Besancon, Axelle
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-01T13:34:20Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-01T13:34:20Z
dc.date.issued 2010-06
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/5726
dc.description.abstract Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) consists of artificially replenishing groundwater to facilitate reuse and/or the associated environmental benefits. Meanwhile, soil aquifer treatment (SAT) is a process of geo-purification designed and operated to improve the quality of the infiltrating water and is thus a type of MAR. SAT consists of a basin operating under rotation of drying and wetting periods. Often, SAT involves water of impaired quality applied onto soil and consequently it implies various risks of health, geochemical and physical nature with difficult or irreversible remediation. To study the effect of pre-treatment on SAT a pilot plant including conventional activated sludge (CAS), a membrane bioreactor (MBR), tertiary and secondary vertical flow reed beds (VFRB) and SAT soil columns. The sludge retention time (SRT) in the CAS and MBR processes was changed every 6 months to look at the impact of SRT on SAT. Each unit and treatment train effluent was characterised to determine the impact of effluent quality on SAT performance. This study showed that tertiary VFRB, especially when fed with MBR effluent, was the best option for SAT and irrigation reuse as it provided the best compliance with reuse standards and the best fertilisation potential. However, long-term clogging occurred in SAT after tertiary VFRB, suggesting the need for a longer resting period or shorter wetting period. This study also highlighted the importance of total suspended solids (TSS) content for SAT removal mechanisms and infiltration rate. In particular, SAT fed with high TSS content effluent was susceptible to temperature variation. Hence the duration of wetting and flooding periods should be adapted according to the season. Further, variation in SRT only indirectly affected pollutants removal by the system including CAS treatment set up at 6 d SRT where the N compounds balance was favourable to an autotrophic N removal. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Cranfield University en_UK
dc.rights © Cranfield University 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. en_UK
dc.subject Soil aquifer treatment en_UK
dc.subject MBR en_UK
dc.subject activated sludge en_UK
dc.subject reed bed en_UK
dc.subject sludge retention time en_UK
dc.subject phosphorus en_UK
dc.subject metal en_UK
dc.title Technologies and multi-barrier systems for sustainable groundwater recharge and irrigation en_UK
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_UK
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics