Residues characterisation from the fluidised bed combustion of East London's solid recovered fuel

Date published

2010-07-31T00:00:00Z

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

0956-053X

Format

Citation

D.E. Balampanis, S.J.T. Pollard, N. Simms, P. Longhurst, F. Coulon, R. Villa, Residues characterisation from the fluidised bed combustion of East London's solid recovered fuel, Waste Management, Volume 30, Issue 7, July 2010, Pages 1318–1324.

Abstract

Waste thermal treatment in Europe is moving towards the utilisation of the combustible output of mechanical, biological treatment (MBT) plants. The standardisation of solid recovered fuels (SRF) is expected to support this trend and increase the amount of the generated combustion residues. In this work, the residues and especially the fly ashes from the fluidised bed combustion (FBC) of East London’s NCV 3, Cl 2, and Hg 1 class SRF, are characterised. The following toxicity indicators have been studied: leachable chlorine, organochlorides expressed as pentachlorobenzene and hexachlorobenzene, and the heavy metals Cu, Cr, Cd, Zn, Ni, and Pb. Furthermore the mineralogical pattern of the ashes has been studied by means of XRD and SEM–EDS. The results suggest that these SRF derived ashes have significantly lower quantities of Cu, Cd, Pb, Zn, leachable Cl, and organochlorides when compared to other literature values from traditional waste thermal treatment applications. This fact highlights the importance of modern separation technologies employed in MBT plants for the removal of components rich in metals and chlorine from the combustible output fraction of SRF resulting to less hazardous residues.(C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reser

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

pollution-control residues mswi fly-ash incineration wastes

DOI

Rights

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Waste Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Waste Management, VOL 30, ISSUE 7, (2010)] DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.012

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s