Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Document Type: ||Thesis or dissertation|
|Title: ||Railway management : an evaluation of management cybernetics in a public enterprise|
|Authors: ||Paradissopoulos, Iordanis K.|
|Supervisors: ||Seaton, R. A. F.|
|Issue Date: ||Mar-1989|
|Abstract: ||Two are the objectives of this thesis:
To identify structural and cultural causes of ineffectiveness in a state-owned railway enterprise
in the light of the management cybernetics area of knowledge.
To assess the capacity of this area of knowledge, especially in its abstract and coded form
(Beer's Model of the Viable System), to provide adequate explanations of organizational
performance and organizational failure.
The objectives are sought in the analysis of an actual enterprise, the Greek Railways
An 'ethnographic type' pilot study is initially undertaken, to highlight organizational problems
under a management cybernetics perspective. The study, though demonstrating structural problems
associated with a certain organizational culture, is assumed in itself inadequate, as it reflects a
subjective interpretation of reality.
A 'survey within the case study' is therefore undertaken aiming at deriving the real dimensions
of organizational problems from an analysis of managerial responses.
Responses are designed to provide a picture of both
the actual way in which the enterprise organizes in the pursuit of its tasks, and
the organizational culture.
The first subtheme (organizational structure) is examined in terms of the cybernetic model of
the viable organization. The findings, in general, validate the assumptions of the ethnographic
study. Numerous structural problems are identified.
The second subtheme (culture) is examined in terms of managerial cohesiveness, defined as the
agreement between managers on key issues of the identity of the enterprise. The overall conclusion
is that though managers are, in general, in agreement, the content of this agreement tends rather to
reflect a shared pessimistic view of the future than cohesiveness facilitating viability and
The conclusion, as regards the enterprise, is, that though many problems are reflected in the
organizational structure, proper modifications of this structure may not suffice to guarantee
improved performance, unless considerable attention is paid in the building of a relevant
organizational culture, quite difficult under the specific circumstances.
The conclusion, as regards the adopted methodology, is that though Beer's model of the viable
system assists in a diagnosis of many organizational deficiencies, it may not suffice to promote
organizational change, especially when narrowly perceived, i. e., when results to a concentration on
structural arrangements in the expense of the building of a corporate culture. Certain
methodologies should develop, which, while making use of the advantages of the model, will not
underestimate other significant aspects of organizational reality.|
|Appears in Collections:||PhD, EngD and MSc by research theses (School of Applied Sciences)|
Items in CERES are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.