Abstract:
This work has a single aim, focusing on developing a political risk model relevant for
tourism organisations, which are operating in an increasingly complex and turbulent
international environment. It pays particular attention to the language of risk (how risks
are articulated and described), the culture of risk (how risks are viewed), and the risk
process (how they are analysed and assessed).
The work critically evaluates a variety of methods that can be utilised to scan, analyse
and assess political hazards and risks. It finds that many of the existing methods of
political and country risk assessment are limited and not sufficiently contextualised to the
needs of the tourism industry. Whilst many models can have an attractive façade of using
positivistic methods to calculate political risks, in practice these are fraught with
problems. The study also highlights a more complex relationship between tourism and
political instability, whereby tourism can be characterised as much by its robustness, as
its sensitivity.
A model is developed which primarily adapts a systems theory approach, whereby a
language, culture and practical process is developed through which the analysis of
various factors and indicators can take place. The approach adopted has a number of
stages, which vary in the amount of data necessary for the analysis and assessment of
political risks. The model begins by utilising existing travel advice databases, moving
onto an analysis of the frequency of past events, then to the nature of the political system
itself, finishing with an analysis and assessment of more complex input factors and
indicators which relate to notions of causation. One of the more provocative features of
the model is the argument that it is more than possible to make an assessment of the risks
that the political environment can pose to a tourism organisation, without necessarily
understanding theories of causation.
