Citation:
E. K. Weatherhead and M. Rivas-Casado, Survey of Irrigation of Outdoor Crops in 2005 - England and Wales. August 2007, Cranfield Universtiy.
Abstract:
This report presents and discusses the results of the Survey of Irrigation of
Outdoor Crops in 2005 for England and Wales. The data includes areas irrigated
and volumes of water used, by crop category, as well as information on
irrigation scheduling, application methods, water sources and water resources.
The survey was sent to all registered agricultural holdings that irrigated at
least 1 hectare, as reported to the 2005 June Agricultural Survey. It is
estimated that responses were received for England from 21% of all irrigated
holdings, representing 27% of the total irrigated area. For Wales, which
contains less than 1% of the total irrigated area, the corresponding figures are
lower, at 12% of holdings and 17% of the total irrigated area. In addition, all
others who responded to the 2001 survey were surveyed, but are not included in
the above figures. Results are presented for England, Wales, the eight
Environment Agency regions and 28 CAMS catchments, as far as confidentiality
restrictions allow. When analysing results, it is important to consider the
weather in each year. In irrigation terms, 2005 was a wet year, depressing the
areas irrigated and water used. The irrigated areas and volumes of water applied
fell for almost all crop categories compared to 2001, and particularly for main
crop potatoes. Nevertheless, potatoes, remained the dominant irrigated crop,
followed by vegetables. Water use reduced from all sources, with a slight
increase in the proportion from groundwater. The proportion of the area where
irrigation is scheduled scientifically rose to 60%. Hose- reel irrigation
systems remain the predominant irrigation method, with more fitted with booms.
The proportion irrigated by trickle (drip) remained constant at 5%. Just under
half of the available water resources were reported used. Only 10% of holdings
would have used more water if available, and only an additional 14% would have
been used. Over 40% of holdings reported having some storage capacity. If linear
trends are assumed over 1982-2005, the growth in total irrigated area and total
water use are lower than reported previously for 1982-2001. An alternative
explanation is that there was a reduction in irrigation growth rates some time
around 2000. This explanation is supported by the trend in actual abstractions
for agricultural spray irrigation recorded in the Environment Agency NALD
database. A further survey is recommended for 2010.