Citation:
Monica Franco-Santos, Mike Kennerley, Pietro Micheli, Veronica Martinez, Steve
Mason, Bernard Marr, Dina Gray, Andrew Neely. Towards a definition of a business
performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 2007, Vol.27(8), pp.784-801
Abstract:
Scholars in the field of performance measurement tend to use the term business
performance measurement (BPM) systems without explaining exactly what they mean
by it. This lack of clarity creates confusion and comparability issues, and
makes it difficult for researchers to build on one an each other's work. The
purpose of this paper is to identify the key characteristics of a BPM system, by
reviewing the different definitions of a BPM system that exist in the
literature. This work aims to open a debate on what are the necessary and
sufficient conditions of a BPM system. It is also hoped that a greater level of
clarity in the performance measurement research arena will be encouraged.
Design/methodology/approach--The performance measurement literature is reviewed
using a systematic approach. Findings--Based on this research, a set of
conditions of a BPM system has been proposed from which researchers can choose
those which are necessary and sufficient conditions for their studies. Research
limitations/implications--The analysis in this paper provides a structure and
set of characteristics that researchers could use as a reference framework to
define a BPM system for their work, and as a way to define the specific focus of
their investigations. More clarity and precision around the use of the BPM
systems phrase will improve the generalisability and comparability of research
in this area. Originality/value--By reviewing the different definitions of a BPM
system that exist in the literature this paper will hopefully stimulate a debate
on the necessary and sufficient conditions of a BPM system and encourage a
greater level of clarity in the performance measurement research arena.