Sustained monopolistic business relationships: A UK defence procurement case.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Humphries, Andrew -
dc.contributor.author Wilding, Richard D. -
dc.date.accessioned 2014-03-13T04:00:45Z
dc.date.available 2014-03-13T04:00:45Z
dc.date.issued 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z -
dc.identifier.citation Andrew Humphries and Richard Wilding; Sustained monopolistic business relationships: A UK defence procurement case, European Journal of Marketing, 2004, Vol. 38, No. 1-2, pp99-120 -
dc.identifier.issn 0309-0566 -
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560410511140 -
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/2776
dc.description.abstract Business-to-business relationships within sustained monopolies, such as those within UK defence procurement, have received scant attention by management researchers. This is unusual because under these market circumstances there appear to be few incentives to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes despite their strategic policy importance. This paper argues that an understanding of the monopolistic environment using a transaction cost economics theoretical framework and relationship marketing concepts provides an approach to solving this problem as well as testing aspects of these disciplines empirically in a novel area. This plan is supported by the results from a pilot study and the paper concludes by proposing a substantial research project to test this hypothesis in the UK defence procurement situation. en_UK
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited en_UK
dc.subject Defence sector en_UK
dc.subject Monopolies en_UK
dc.subject Relationship marketing en_UK
dc.subject Transaction costs en_UK
dc.subject United Kingdom en_UK
dc.title Sustained monopolistic business relationships: A UK defence procurement case. en_UK
dc.type Article -


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics