dc.contributor.author |
Guenov, Marin D. |
- |
dc.contributor.author |
Libish |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tang, Dunbing |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lockett, Helen L. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-11-13T23:04:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-11-13T23:04:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2006-12-01T00:00:00Z |
- |
dc.identifier.citation |
Guenov, M.D., Libish, Tang, D. and Lockett, H. Computational design process
modelling. Proceedings of 25th International Council of the Aeronautical
Sciences, 3-8 September, 2006, Hamburg, Germany. |
- |
dc.identifier.isbn |
953399176 |
- |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/2624 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In the conceptual design phase, relatively simple equations and functions (or
compiled code) are used to describe the aircraft and to perform trade-off
studies. The latter require an optimal execution sequence in order to reduce
computational cost and design time, respectively. The focus of this paper is the
dynamic derivation of the optimal computational plan for each study so that the
designer could focus on designing the aircraft rather than managing the process
flow. Two methodologies, the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and the Incidence
Matrix are used for the computational process modeling. The incidence matrix
describes the relationship between variables and equations/models. The DSM has
been used to express the dependency relationships between the models and also,
after manipulation, to produce the solution process. The designer specifies the
independent (known) variables first. Then the variable flow is modeled using the
Incidence Matrix Method (IMM). It determines how data flows through the models,
and also identifies any strongly connected components (SCCs). The second step is
to rearrange all equations/models hierarchically in order to reduce the feedback
loops in each of the identified SCCs. This is achieved by the application of a
genetic-based algorithm. Subsequently all SCCs and noncoupled models are
assembled into a macro model which forms a global DSM. The global DSM is further
rearranged to obtain an upper triangular matrix which defines the final model
execution sequence. A simple aircraft sizing example is presented to illustrate
the proposed method and algorithm. Advantages of the method include improved
efficiency and the ability to deal with both algebraic and numerical models as
well as with multiple outputs per model. |
en_UK |
dc.subject |
Incidence Matrix |
en_UK |
dc.subject |
Design Structure Matrix |
en_UK |
dc.subject |
Computational Plan |
en_UK |
dc.subject |
Conceptual Aircraft Design |
en_UK |
dc.subject |
Process Modeling |
en_UK |
dc.title |
Computational design process modelling |
en_UK |
dc.type |
Conference paper |
- |