Computational design process modelling

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Guenov, Marin D. -
dc.contributor.author Libish
dc.contributor.author Tang, Dunbing
dc.contributor.author Lockett, Helen L.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-11-13T23:04:54Z
dc.date.available 2011-11-13T23:04:54Z
dc.date.issued 2006-12-01T00:00:00Z -
dc.identifier.citation Guenov MD, Libish, Tang D, Lockett H. (2006) Computational design process modelling. Proceedings of 25th International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3-8 September, 2006, Hamburg, Germany -
dc.identifier.isbn 953399176 -
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/2624
dc.description.abstract In the conceptual design phase, relatively simple equations and functions (or compiled code) are used to describe the aircraft and to perform trade-off studies. The latter require an optimal execution sequence in order to reduce computational cost and design time, respectively. The focus of this paper is the dynamic derivation of the optimal computational plan for each study so that the designer could focus on designing the aircraft rather than managing the process flow. Two methodologies, the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and the Incidence Matrix are used for the computational process modeling. The incidence matrix describes the relationship between variables and equations/models. The DSM has been used to express the dependency relationships between the models and also, after manipulation, to produce the solution process. The designer specifies the independent (known) variables first. Then the variable flow is modeled using the Incidence Matrix Method (IMM). It determines how data flows through the models, and also identifies any strongly connected components (SCCs). The second step is to rearrange all equations/models hierarchically in order to reduce the feedback loops in each of the identified SCCs. This is achieved by the application of a genetic-based algorithm. Subsequently all SCCs and noncoupled models are assembled into a macro model which forms a global DSM. The global DSM is further rearranged to obtain an upper triangular matrix which defines the final model execution sequence. A simple aircraft sizing example is presented to illustrate the proposed method and algorithm. Advantages of the method include improved efficiency and the ability to deal with both algebraic and numerical models as well as with multiple outputs per model. en_UK
dc.subject Incidence Matrix en_UK
dc.subject Design Structure Matrix en_UK
dc.subject Computational Plan en_UK
dc.subject Conceptual Aircraft Design en_UK
dc.subject Process Modeling en_UK
dc.title Computational design process modelling en_UK
dc.type Conference paper -


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics