Abstract:
This study aims to demonstrate the different experiences in the Japanese domestic air
transport market compared to those of the intra-EU market as a result of liberalisation
along with the Slot allocations from 1997 to 2005 at Haneda (Tokyo international)
airport and to identify the constraints for air transport liberalisation in Japan. The main
contribution of this study is the identification of the structure of deregulated air
transport market during the process of liberalisation using qualitative and quantitative
techniques and the provision of an analytical approach to explain the constraints for
liberalisation. Moreover, this research is considered original because the results of air
transport liberalisation in Japan are verified and confirmed by Structural Equation
Modelling, demonstrating the importance of each factor which affects the market.
The Tokyo domestic routes were investigated as a major market in Japan in order to
analyse the effects of liberalisation of air transport. The Tokyo routes market has seven
prominent characteristics as follows: (1) high volume of demand, (2) influence of slots,
(3) different features of each market category, (4) relatively low load factors, (5)
significant market seasonality, (6) competition with high speed rail, and (7) high fares in
the market. These characteristics particularly stand out when comparing to routes
serving the UK, including UK domestics.
Moreover, the outcomes of the analysis demonstrated the three significant different
experiences compared to the intra-EU market serving the UK as a result of
liberalisation: (1) decreased demand, (2) increased fares and (3) new entrants’ failures.
Although competition among airlines seemed to be experienced in the beginning of the
process of liberalisation, most of new entrants are governed by the control of network
carriers, and this has affected the market, which resulted in fares to increase and
demand to drop, particularly in the low demand markets. However, several markets on
the Tokyo routes have been developed by low fares as a result of competition with high
speed rail such as the Tokyo-Hiroshima and Okayama routes. The key objectives of the slot allocation policies were the promotion of competition and
the improvement of consumer’s convenience with safety assured. They have not been
accomplished yet because of several constraints.
The constraints for liberalisation in Japan were discovered by comparing with the
virtuous market flow circulation in the EU. The results of liberalisation in Japan have
the opposite direction flow because airlines provide “high yield products”, which are
caused by high cost structures of air transport in Japan, compared to the “high
productivity products” of the EU.
It is very difficult to promote a real basis for competition among airlines and HSR in
Japan. Governments have been developing the transportation network of both rail and
air in line with the growth of the Japanese economy under the name of competition
policy since 1960s. The overestimated airport planning and demand by the government
based on the bubble economy in Japan caused high cost structures as well.
Furthermore, the Japanese Government has been reluctant to implement significant
changes and face the impacts of deregulation in order to avoid the bankruptcies of
airlines experienced in other liberalised markets. Therefore, the intensity of competition
in the Japanese air transport has been interpreted and implemented differently from
those of other areas as a result of this protective policy towards Japanese airlines. The
standard of competition has not reached the level of other industries like manufacturing,
which have been competing in the global market. It seems that Japanese government
policy has accomplished its objective which forced two network carriers (JAL and
ANA) to change the structure of organisations, labour cost and their companies’
hierarchical cultures, although the intensity of change is not enough compared with
other airlines outside Japan as a result of liberalisation.
Lower fares and reduced costs are crucial in order to develop demand and switch the
direction of the market flow in Japan, as evidenced in the intra-EU market.
A real basis for competition is expected when the number of slots will increase at
Haneda airport in 2009. In order to prepare for the next step of liberalisation and
international competition, fundamental changes and innovation should be implemented
by removing constraints in the Japanese air transport system.