Trichophyton species: use of volatile fingerprints for rapid identification and discrimination.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sahgal, Natasha
dc.contributor.author Monk, Barry
dc.contributor.author Wasil, Mohammad
dc.contributor.author Magan, Naresh
dc.date.accessioned 2008-02-05T09:53:23Z
dc.date.available 2008-02-05T09:53:23Z
dc.date.issued 2006-12
dc.identifier.citation N. Sahgal, B. Monk, M. Wasil, N. Magan, Trichophyton species: use of volatile fingerprints for rapid identification and discrimination. British Journal of Dermatology, 2006, v155(6), 1209–1216. en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0007-0963
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1826/2288
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07549.x
dc.description.abstract Background: Fungal infection of the skin is a common clinical problem, and laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis is important to ensure appropriate treatment. The identification of the species of fungus is also important, because different fungal species have different modes of transmission, and this may be of importance both in preventing re-infection or in avoidance of infection of others. Objective: This study examined the potential of using volatile production patterns for the detection and discrimination between four Trichophyton species (T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. verrucosum and T. violaceum) in vitro on solid media and in broth culture. Methods: Two different sensor array systems (conducting polymer and metal oxide sensors) were examined for comparing the qualitative volatile fingerprints produced by these species over periods of 24-120 hrs in the headspace. The relative sensitivity of detection of two of the species (T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum) was determined for log1 to log7 inoculum levels over the same time period. Results: The conducting polymer based system was unable to differentiate between species based on volatile fingerprints over the experimental period. However, metal oxide-based sensor arrays were found to be able to differentiate between the four species within 96 hrs of growth using PCA analysis which accounted for approximately 93% of the data in PC1 and 2 based on the qualitative volatile production patterns. This differentiation was confirmed by the Cluster analysis of the data using Euclidean distance and Ward’s linkage. Studies of the sensitivity of detection showed that for T. mentagrophytes and T. rubrum it was possible to differentiate between log3, log5 and log7 inoculum levels within 96 hrs. Conclusions: This is the first detailed study of the use of qualitative volatile fingerprints for identification and discrimination of dermatophytes. This approach could have potential for rapid identification of patient samples reducing significantly the time to treatment. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing en_UK
dc.subject Trichophyton species en_UK
dc.subject early detection en_UK
dc.subject electronic nose en_UK
dc.subject volatile fingerprints en_UK
dc.title Trichophyton species: use of volatile fingerprints for rapid identification and discrimination. en_UK
dc.type Postprint en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics