Citation:
N. Sahgal, B. Monk, M. Wasil, N. Magan, Trichophyton species: use of volatile fingerprints for rapid identification and discrimination. British Journal of Dermatology, 2006, v155(6), 1209–1216.
Abstract:
Background: Fungal infection of the skin is a common clinical problem, and laboratory
confirmation of the diagnosis is important to ensure appropriate treatment. The identification
of the species of fungus is also important, because different fungal species have different
modes of transmission, and this may be of importance both in preventing re-infection or in
avoidance of infection of others.
Objective: This study examined the potential of using volatile production patterns for the
detection and discrimination between four Trichophyton species (T. mentagrophytes, T.
rubrum, T. verrucosum and T. violaceum) in vitro on solid media and in broth culture.
Methods: Two different sensor array systems (conducting polymer and metal oxide sensors)
were examined for comparing the qualitative volatile fingerprints produced by these species
over periods of 24-120 hrs in the headspace. The relative sensitivity of detection of two of the
species (T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum) was determined for log1 to log7 inoculum levels over
the same time period.
Results: The conducting polymer based system was unable to differentiate between species
based on volatile fingerprints over the experimental period. However, metal oxide-based
sensor arrays were found to be able to differentiate between the four species within 96 hrs of
growth using PCA analysis which accounted for approximately 93% of the data in PC1 and 2
based on the qualitative volatile production patterns. This differentiation was confirmed by
the Cluster analysis of the data using Euclidean distance and Ward’s linkage. Studies of the
sensitivity of detection showed that for T. mentagrophytes and T. rubrum it was possible to
differentiate between log3, log5 and log7 inoculum levels within 96 hrs.
Conclusions: This is the first detailed study of the use of qualitative volatile fingerprints for
identification and discrimination of dermatophytes. This approach could have potential for
rapid identification of patient samples reducing significantly the time to treatment.