Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 and Inconel 625 Produced Through The Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Process

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author James, William
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-04T16:04:48Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-04T16:04:48Z
dc.date.issued 2022-01-12T12:26:44Z
dc.identifier.citation James, William (2022). Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 and Inconel 625 Produced Through The Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Process. Cranfield Online Research Data (CORD). Poster. https://doi.org/10.17862/cranfield.rd.18268613.v1
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/21382
dc.description.abstract In developing the wire + arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process for heat resistant alloys used in high-speed flight applications, structures were built from nickel-based superalloys Inconel 718 (IN718) and Inconel 625 (IN625). In this paper, wall structures were deposited in both superalloys, using a plasma transferred arc process. The microstructure was analysed optically and under SEM; both alloys were seen to be of typical dendritic structure with long columnar grains, with little variation between the alloys. The findings suggest that the structures included significant segregation of heavy metals, with potential Laves phases and δ-phases also found across the alloys, which showed significantly more segregation of Nb and Mo at the grain boundaries and inter-dendritic regions. The alloys also underwent room temperature mechanical testing, in addition to this IN625 specimens were tested after a solutionising and ageing treatment. Hardness measurements indicated that in general the WAAM process has the effect of increasing material hardness by approximately 10%, when compared to wrought alloy in a solutionised state. In IN625 the heat-treated specimens showed an increase in hardness of around 6%, when compared with its as-deposited condition. Elongation in IN625 showed much greater values. Overall, IN718 showed a greater strength with less elongation than IN625. A comparison between both alloys and their stated maximum UTS and YS values from literature revealed that WAAM built IN718 and IN625 in its as-deposited condition can achieve just over half the maximum achievable UTS, with no post-process treatment. The heat-treatment process tested in IN625 marginally reduced the gap in UTS performance by 3.5%.
dc.description.sponsorship Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL)
dc.publisher Cranfield University
dc.rights CC BY 4.0
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Additive manufacture (AM)'
dc.subject 'Material Characterisation'
dc.subject 'Inconel'
dc.subject 'DSDS21'
dc.subject 'DSDS21 Poster'
dc.subject 'WAAM'
dc.subject 'Welding'
dc.subject 'Inconel 718'
dc.subject 'Inconel 625'
dc.subject 'Mechanical properties'
dc.subject 'Additive Manufacturing'
dc.title Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 and Inconel 625 Produced Through The Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Process
dc.type Poster
dc.identifier.doi 10.17862/cranfield.rd.18268613.v1


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • DSDS 21 [25]
    2021 Defence and Security Doctoral Symposia

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0 Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics