Abstract:
Organizational search is an inherent part of innovation and enables the creation of new
knowledge combinations. It precedes the selection and implementation stages of the
innovation management process, which is often concerned with ideas that have
commercial potential. There is extensive evidence of global trends that require
organisations to innovate in pursuit of sustainable development aims. This transpires a
sense of urgency associated with a loss of ecosystem, depletion of natural resources and
minerals, climate change and high rates of unalleviated poverty. Such contextual
changes call for investigative inquiry into organizations search behaviours for
sustainability-oriented innovations (SOI) that privilege open exploration and
exploitation of novel sources of value.
This more distributed approach to organisational search illustrates venturing in
‘unfamiliar’ territories with so-called ‘unusual partners’. Examples include not-for-
profit, no-governmental agencies, civil society and public administrative governmental
bodies – as a broader set of stakeholders engaged to identify valuable opportunities for
innovation. Search in such collaborations is distinguished from traditional experience,
as multiple institutional boundaries are spanned to source new knowledge inputs. These
collective endeavours create hybrid organizational forms in which a variety of
institutional orders and logics perform. Moreover, they have the capacity to coalesce
seemingly competing and antagonistic missions to deliver social, environmental and
economic progress. These efforts foster creativity by accessing knowledge and
resources from beyond ‘familiar’ territories and boundaries to enhance levels of
innovativeness. Recent studies in the field of organizational search have begun to focus
on this phenomenon of ‘variety creation’. Such works proffer the merits of
organisational boundary spanning behaviours, but to date have been limited to
transcending disciplinary, departmental, organisational and sectoral boundaries and
knowledge territories.
This doctoral study deploys an exploratory detailed case study approach in a market
leading multi-national automotive organisation that engages multiple institutional
partners for the purposes of innovation. The findings from ten case projects demonstrate
that ‘institutional pluralism’ affects the search for SOI opportunities in five major ways.
First of all, institutional pluralism provides slack and second, it triggers both local and
non-local search types. Third, the relationship between distinct institutional logics
promotes different levels of (knowledge) variety creation. Fourth, ‘aligned’ logics have
a more positive effect on both variety creation and levels of radicalness. Finally, as the
number of logics engaged increases, the range and scope for innovation broadens. The
overall theoretical contribution is to the organisation search literature and proposes
institutional pluralism as a further mechanism for variety creation. This general
contribution has led to further insights concerning the role of slack in local and non-
local search variants and logic relationships during the search for innovation
opportunities with so-called unusual partners.