Differences in perception of the importance of process safety indicators between experts in Iran and the West

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Omidi, Leila
dc.contributor.author Dolatabad, Khadijeh Mostafaee
dc.contributor.author Pilbeam, Colin
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-15T14:03:02Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-15T14:03:02Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-10
dc.identifier.citation Omidi L, Dolatabad KM, Pilbeam C. (2023) Differences in perception of the importance of process safety indicators between experts in Iran and the West, Journal of Safety Research, Volume 84, February 2023, pp. 261-272 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0022-4375
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.11.002
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/19203
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The importance of safety in high-risk industries such as oil and gas facilities has been reported previously. Process safety performance indicators can provide insight into improving the safety of process industries. This paper aims to rank the process safety indicators (metrics) by Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) using the data gathered through a survey. Method: The study uses a structured approach considering the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), and the IOGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers) recommendations and guidelines to generate an aggregate set of indicators. It calculates the level of importance of each indicator based on the opinions of experts from Iran and some Western countries. Results: The findings of the study demonstrate that some lagging indicators such as the number of times processes do not proceed as planned due to insufficient staff competence and the number of unexpected disruptions of the process due to failure in instrumentation and alarms are important in process industries in both Iran and Western countries. Western experts identified process safety incident severity rate as an important lagging indicator, whereas Iranian experts considered this as relatively unimportant. In addition, leading indicators such as sufficient process safety training and competency, the desired function of instrumentation and alarms, and proper management of fatigue risk play an important role in enhancing the safety performance of process industries. Experts in Iran viewed permit to work as an important leading indicator, while experts in the West focused on fatigue risk management. Practical Applications: The methodology used in the current study gives a good view to managers and safety professionals in regard to the most important indicators of process safety and allows them to focus more on important process safety indicators. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Process safety en_UK
dc.subject Lagging indicators en_UK
dc.subject Leading indicators en_UK
dc.subject Process industries en_UK
dc.subject Fuzzy best worst method en_UK
dc.title Differences in perception of the importance of process safety indicators between experts in Iran and the West en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK
dc.identifier.eissn 1879-1247


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics