Assessing preferences for cultural ecosystem services in the English countryside using Q methodology

Date published

2023-01-26

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI

Department

Type

Article

ISSN

2073-445X

Format

Citation

Hubatova M, McGinlay J, Parsons DJ, et al., (2023) Assessing preferences for cultural ecosystem services in the English countryside using Q methodology, Land, Volume 12, Issue 2, January 2023, Article number 331

Abstract

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are difficult to assess due to the subjective and diverse way in which they are experienced. This can make it difficult to apply CES research to enhance human experience of nature. This study applies Q methodology to group people according to their preferences for CES. The Q methodology survey was carried out with 47 local residents and tourists in Wiltshire, in South West England. Four groups of respondents were identified drawing value from nature through: (1) spiritual benefits and mental well-being (Group 1—Inspired by nature); (2) nature and biodiversity conservation (Group 1—Conserving nature); (3) cultural heritage in multifunctional landscapes (Group 3—Countryside mix); and (4) opportunities for outdoor activities (Group 4—Outdoor pursuits). All four groups stated that benefits from nature were enhanced by actually visiting the countryside, through a better understanding of nature itself, and through a range of sensory experiences. They particularly identified relaxation opportunities as a very important CES benefit. These findings, and the demonstrated use of the Q methodology, could support local planning and landscape management in order to provide accessible and functional landscapes that can provide a range of different CES benefits to people.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

Q methodology, cultural ecosystem services, Wiltshire, multifunctional landscapes, nature’s contributions to people

DOI

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s

Natural Environment Research Council (NERC): NE/J014710/1 European Union funding