Monotone integrated large eddy simulation of supersonic boundary layer flows

Date

2001-02

Free to read from

Supervisor/s

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Department

Type

Thesis

ISSN

Format

Citation

Abstract

For simulations of supersonic flows shock-capturing schemes have to be used. A shock-capturing scheme produces more dissipation than a central difference scheme. In fact, the numerical dissipation produced by shock-capturing schemes is problematic when performing Large Eddy Simulation of supersonic flows with shock-waves. Another train of thought is to turn the numerical dissipation to our advantage. If the numerical dissipation of a numerical method can mimic the dissipation of the subgrid-scale(SGS) eddies, not only is SGS modelling unnecessary, but the numerical dissipation will be a positive contribution to the calculation. This approach is called MILES. As a reference case, a zero-pressure-gradient, flat-plate boundary-layer flow was chosen as there are analytical, experimental, DNS and LES results available. The freestream conditions are a Mach number of 2.25 and a Reynolds number of 1.613 x 104/in or 6.007 x 103 based on the displacement thickness. The central difference scheme, Osher’s scheme and Roe’s scheme are tested for suitability in MILES. The central difference scheme is found to be numerically^ too non-dissipative without SGS modelling. Osher’s scheme is too dissipative so that it hinders the development of turbulence. Roe’s scheme without use of a limiter seems to have the right amount of numerical dissipation to mimic a SGS model. Two popular slope limiters were also tested, but both affected turbulence development when no shockwave was present.

Description

Software Description

Software Language

Github

Keywords

DOI

Rights

Relationships

Relationships

Supplements

Funder/s